 |
When writing in
academic contexts both first language (L1) students and second
language (L2) students need to
 |
understand
what they are doing |
 |
know
where to look for help. |
According to
Halliday, the pragmatic explanation for any level of the linguistic
system is to be found in the ‘exponance’ of that level — that
is, in the level next below it, which lays out the elements of which
the level above is composed. e4e
uses hyperlinks and navigation systems to allow users to move on any
level either vertically to the level below (for explanation or
exploration) or horizontally on the same level.
|
 |
All tertiary
students in all disciplines need to be assisted to acquire core
resources and skills (that is, those which are shared by all
disciplines), in order to perform successfully in the written and
spoken discourses of formal English. e4e
provides information and practice in most academic discourses; it is,
however, structured around the linguistic similarities among
disciplines rather than the differences between them (Hutchinson and
Waters 1987, passim). The reasons for this approach are linguistic,
logical, design-driven, practical, and in the current educational
climate, economic.
|
 |
It is worth noticing
that Halliday points out that assessment can best judge ‘performance’,
and not, as OBE and as formalist linguistics require, ‘competence’
(Halliday 1973 Explorations in the function of language 52-3).
The word competence has ideological overtones which don’t consort
comfortably with pragmatic approaches to language description.
|

Why use systemic
functional linguistics for language support?
Functional linguists
begin from a data base of samples of the kinds of language which are used
in different situations (registers). They study language use in its social
context. It is possible to analyse statistically what L1 speakers feel is
appropriate in particular situations or contexts. Words can be grouped in
sets, the members of which can potentially be substituted for each other
in specific contexts. Lexical, grammatical and syntactic systems contain
the potential elements of specific language strings. Sets are items or
forms which can be substituted for each other without offending the
currently accepted language patterns. Patterns change and evolve through
time. Any one change has compensatory repercussions throughout the system,
until the potential for misunderstanding or ambiguity evolves out. Fit
systems survive.
Good English (or good
French, or good Xhosa) is therefore the kind of language which most people
at a given time and in a given place agree is appropriate for the
situation in which it is used.
Meaning is defined by
the context in which specific bits of language are used (the
surrounding language or situation in all its complexity: systemic
functional linguistics determines the register of a piece of language by
defining its domain, tenor and mode). This is how we avoid ambiguity. For
example, to interpret the words ‘You have made your bed - now you must
lie on it’, we need to know whether ‘you’ , a poor 18th
century Scottish peasant, perhaps, have been gathering straw and are about
to give birth, or whether ‘you’ have perhaps made a foolish choice and
are now going to have to live with it. Whether those words were written or
spoken, the surrounding words or surrounding events will usually leave us
in no doubt as to what they mean on a specific occasion. For functional
linguists, words do not have ‘Meaning’ in an essential sense —
meaning is contingent, the result of evolution and change and chance.
Grammar, syntax are subject to the same conditions of change and custom
and culture.
In the area of language
support, functional linguistics makes clear that the register
to be mastered is that of formal or academic English, written or spoken.
Students need to master specific forms, genres, styles, lexis, syntax,
skills, processes, knowledge which are appropriate to this register, with
application to the discourses of their specific subjects / disciplines.
For example, one might drill students to say ‘It is I’ and not ‘It’s
me’ - but those are forms which students are unlikely to need in formal
written registers, and when they speak they will be inappropriately
pedantic. Functional linguistics prefers ‘appropriate / inappropriate’
to ‘correct / incorrect, right / wrong’. The communication of meaning
operates on a sliding scale, from clarity to impenetrability.
e4e
therefore tries to provide students with the means to find for themselves
the language knowledge and processes they need, and also to find
explanations when they want to understand.

Assessment and
outcomes
One of the goals of
language support is professionalism. e4e
aims to provide
students with the means to evaluate their own language needs, to seek
solutions to their problems at their own pace, and in the spirit of
life-long learning, to prioritise knowing how to find information over
knowing right answers.
e4e
uses the processes of editing professional Englishes to structure learning through the levels of systemic linguistics, from phoneme to genre and register on one axis, from past to present on another, and from situation ('reality') to its textual analogues on another.
e4e
accepts that English is at present an international language of
communication. English as the national language of England or of the
United States is not the concern of the program. Learning about the
systems of any language enhances the understanding of any other language,
and it is to be hoped that learning to follow a report-writing process in
English will also enhance the ability of students to write reports in
Xhosa or Afrikaans, Zulu or any other language. It may be possible to
teach English while encouraging multilingualism and multiculturalism.